Phil Murphy and Republican challenger Jack Ciattarelli had state and national implications. Wednesday night, making him the first Democrat in nearly five decades to win a second term as New Jersey governor. Phil Murphy was declared the winner just after 6:30 p.m. "Election Day is often too late to discover that a person has been wrongfully purged," the group added.New Jersey residents waited nearly a full 24 hours after polls closed Tuesday night to find out who will lead their state. And they should push for reforms like automatic voter registration and election day registration, which keep voters' registration records up to date." "They must be diligent in their efforts to avoid erroneously purging voters. "Election administrators must be transparent about how they are deciding what names to remove from the rolls," said the organization. ” - Campaign Legal Center Legal Center)Īcross the country, the Brennan Center said Friday, election officials must embrace efforts to make voting easier, not harder, and ensure eligible voters don't show up to the polls in upcoming elections only to find out that their name has been purged. “Unsurprising but disappointing: after getting the okay from #SCOTUS last year, Ohio is getting ready to purge 235,000 voters from the rolls if they don't reply to a notice from the state. In its report, the Brennan Center included a map showing the counties where the most voters were dropped from the rolls. "Voters often do not realize they have been purged until they try to cast a ballot on Election Day-after it's already too late," Morris added. "Troublingly, minority voters are more likely to share names than white voters, potentially exposing them to a greater risk of being purged." "In big states like California and Texas, multiple individuals can have the same name and date of birth, making it hard to be sure that the right voter is being purged when perfect data are unavailable," wrote Morris. The Brennan Center said that while there are legitimate reasons for removing names from a state's voter database, such as a relocation to another state or a death, many voters' names-especially those of minority voters-are purged even though they meet the state's requirements for casting a ballot. "The effect of the Supreme Court's 2013 decision has not abated," researcher Kevin Morris wrote Friday. Holder in 2013, counties with histories of discrimination no longer have to obtain "pre-clearance," or approval from the Department of Justice (DOJ), before they make changes to voting procedures-allowing them to slash their voter rolls liberally, often resulting in voter suppression of eligible voters.Īccording to the Brennan Center, Shelby County single-handedly pushed two million people off voter rolls across the country over four years after the case was decided. In such areas voters were kicked off rolls at a rate 40 percent higher than places which have protected voting rights more consistently.įollowing the Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. The problem was most pronounced in counties and election precincts with a history of racial oppression and voter suppression. The Brennan Center for Justice released a study Thursday showing that 17 million Americans were dropped from voter rolls between 20-almost four million more than the number purged between 20. Millions of Americans are still suffering the consequences of the 2013 Supreme Court decision that loosened restrictions of the Voting Rights Act, giving states with long histories of voter discrimination free rein to purge voters from their rolls without federal oversight.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |